11.25.2008

Happy Thanksgiving

We are headed to the frozen tundra of western New York for the holiday weekend! In addition to lots of snacks and a stack of books (for me!), we have packed the following to pass the time during the trip....

1 DVD player
3 laptop computers
6 iPods
3 Gameboys
3 digital cameras

Unbelievable! How did I ever survive all those long trips in the Pontiac Bonneville station wagon with just one of those car bingo games and my siblings to entertain me?

Happy Thanksgiving everyone! Enjoy!

11.23.2008

That "Joe the Plumber" is one smart dude!

Barack Obama discovers a leak under his sink, so he calls Joe the Plumber to come and fix it. Joe drives to Obama's house, which is located in a very nice neighborhood and where it's clear that all the residents make more than $250,000 per year. Joe arrives and takes his tools into the house. Joe is led to the room that contains the leaky pipe under a sink. Joe assesses the problem and tells Obama, who is standing near the door, that it's an easy repair that will take less than 10 minutes. Obama asks Joe how much it will cost.

Joe immediately says, "$9,500."

"$9,500?" Obama asks, stunned. "But you said it's an easy repair!"

"Yes, but what I do is charge a lot more to my clients who make more than $250,000 per year so I can fix the plumbing of everybody who makes less than that for free," explains Joe.

"It's always been my philosophy. As a matter of fact, I lobbied government to pass this philosophy as law, and it did pass earlier this year, so now all plumbers have to do business this way. It's known as 'Joe's Fair Plumbing Act of 2008.' Surprised you haven't heard of it, Senator."

In spite of that, Obama tells Joe there's no way he's paying that much for a small plumbing repair, so Joe leaves.

Obama spends the next hour flipping through the phone book looking for another plumber, but he finds that all other plumbing businesses listed have gone out of business. Not wanting to pay Joe's price, Obama does nothing. The leak under Obama's sink goes unrepaired for the next several days.

A week later the leak is so bad that Obama has had to put a bucket under the sink. The bucket fills up quickly and has to be emptied every hour, and there's a risk that the room will flood, so Obama calls Joe and pleads with him to return.

Joe goes back to Obama's house, looks at the leaky pipe, and says "Let's see? this will cost you about $21,000."

"A few days ago you told me it would cost $9,500!" Obama quickly fires back.

Joe explains the reason for the dramatic increase. "Well, because of the 'Joe's Fair Plumbing Act,' a lot of rich people are learning how to fix their own plumbing, so there are fewer of you paying for all the free plumbing I'm doing for the people who make less than $250,000. As a result, the rate I have to charge my wealthy paying customers rises every day.

"Not only that, but for some reason the demand for plumbing work from the group of people who get it for free has skyrocketed, and there's a long waiting list of those who need repairs. This has put a lot of my fellow plumbers out of business, and they're not being replaced. Nobody is going into the plumbing business because they know they won't make any money. I'm hurting now too, all thanks to greedy rich people like you who won't pay their fair share."

Obama tries to straighten out the plumber: "Of course you're hurting, Joe! Don't you get it? If all the rich people learn how to fix their own plumbing and you refuse to charge the poorer people for your services, you'll be broke, and then what will you do?"

Joe immediately replies, "Run for president, apparently."

(ht to www.jokesajoke.blogspot.com)

11.20.2008

Signs of the Times....

Earlier this week, Sawyer came to me with a very earnest look on his face. I could tell he had something serious on his mind.

"Mom," he began "I don't want any more tight underwear with pictures on it. I only want boxers. You know, I'm in third grade now and we have to change in front of each other for gym. I don't want the other boys to think I'm a baby."

Duly noted, my no-longer-little-boy.

11.17.2008

Your Laugh for the Day.....

It's been a sad weekend at the VeStrand house. More on that later. Maybe. It would really be great, comical blog fodder if it weren't so sad.

Anyway, saw this on another blog and thought it might make you smile! Happy Monday!

Government Health Warning Issued!!!


Do NOT swallow chewing gum!!

11.16.2008

Paul's Pumpkin Bars

I posted about this dessert on Facebook and several people asked for the recipe so here you go!! I aim to please, you know, but I feel I must warn any Maryland readers: you better never bring this to a function/event in October/
November where I'll be too. It's MY go-to dessert this time of year!

Paul's Pumpkin Bars

4 eggs
1 2/3 cups sugar
1, 15-oz can pumpkin
1 cup oil

Beat above ingredients until light and fluffy. Then add:

2 cups flour
2 tspns. baking powder
2 tspns. cinnamon
1 tspn. salt
1 tspn. baking soda

Mix thoroughly and spread in ungreased jelly roll pan. Bake at 350 degrees for 25-30 minutes.

Frosting

6 ounces cream cheese, softened
1 cup butter
2 tspns. vanilla
4 cups powdered sugar (add slowly until smooth)

Enjoy! These are very moist and always a hit whenever I serve them.

(Question: This is my mom's recipe. Mom, where did you get this originally?)

11.12.2008

Panini, Thy Name is Jennifer

To any male readers, I apologize in advance. This post is entirely "female" in nature, if you get my drift. Daddy, if a small miracle has occurred and you are actually reading the blog today, I promise you that you want to STOP reading right now. Forewarned is forearmed.

Today, I had my first mammogram. Today, I also found out what it feels like to be a panini. You know those yummy sandwiches at Panera? They stuff them full with tomato and mozzarella (my personal favorite) or other yummy things and then use some fancy machine to smoosh them within an inch of their little triangle-shaped lives and serve them to you with a side of chips and a pickle. I had the exact same experience today. Except that I wasn't filled with tomato and mozzarella. Although that may have made the experience more.....ummmm......palatable??!

Those of you women who have ever experienced a mammogram or even a gynecology appointment know that although your actual appointment may be at 11:30, the appointment preparation begins about two hours before you leave the house. And that's how my day began as well. I shaved my legs for the first time in........a while. (This turned out to be a HUGE waste of time as I didn't actually have to remove my jeans for the mammo.) Then I chose my best pair of free Victoria's Secret undies in white, pink, tan, or black (because those are the only colors that are free). This also turned out to be a waste of time as I didn't have to remove my jeans so no one saw my free underwear. Choosing my "best bra" was more of a chore. Pretty unmentionables are not something that I spend money on--as you probably figured out by the frequent mention of my FREE underwear. Again, a waste of time because my "best bra" spent the entire mammogram folded neatly under my shirt in Locker #8.

As I got dressed, I was acutely aware of the fact that I could not apply deodorant or anything of the sort. Now, how my Lady Speed Stick can get in the way of showing a potential mass in my breast I will never understand, but I'm a rule follower, so I followed the rules. And, just to be sure, I didn't apply any lotion, perfume, or even mascara. Because, you just never know......

I arrived and checked in at the radiology center without incident. Miraculously, I only waited about five minutes before I was called back. Interestingly, the nurse called my name (pronounced incorrectly of course) and one other lady's name at the same time. Then she walked us back to the changing rooms together and gave us the "speech" together. You know the one about how the shirt has to tie in the front and how there are "mammo wipes" for those people who didn't follow the rules and used deodorant. (Yes--there really ARE mammo wipes! Why didn't I think of that??) I was beginning to think that Obama's universal healthcare had kicked in already and they were doing "group mammograms" when she sent us to separate dressing rooms and I was mercifully alone!

Shortly, a sweet lady in very stylish black and tan scrubs mispronounced my name again and I was ushered into "Mammography Room C". As I answered the same questions yet again (how many people do I have to tell before they believe that I am NOT pregnant?!), she clicked away on the computer and chatted happily, like we both didn't know what was coming!

Things began to look up when I stood up for the test and she needed to change the "squisher" for a bigger size!! That's the first time in my life that anything involving my "chest" needed to be made larger. But that was the end of the good part. It was all downhill from there.

If I had to describe the mammogram in one word, it would be "embarrassing". How those nurses do that all day long every day is beyond me! And, of course, because I was nervous I made stupid jokes, like asking the technician if she dreamed about breasts at night because she looked at them all day?? Where the heck did that come from?

Then she poked, prodded, pulled, and generally manhandled me for the next 20 minutes. Of course, the fact that I nursed four children, one for a year and three others for 18 months each, made her job a little bit easier. Wet sand in the bottom of a dirty sock is pretty "stretchy", you know?!! And, to add to my indignity, "Climb Every Mountain" was playing through the stereo system. The last thing on my mind at that moment was "following every rainbow until I found my dream"!!! My dream at that moment was just to be done!

Finally, it was over. I returned to the dressing room, relieved Locker #8 of its storage duties, used a bit of the horribly scented deodorant that they so generously provided, and went to Target! You know---that's the cure for every ill! On second thought, maybe I should have gone to Panera and gotten a panini instead!

11.11.2008

Not I Monday........continued on Tuesday

I am DEFINITELY not that hip, cool gal tooling around town in that hip, cool 2001 blue Nissan Altima with that hip, cool duct tape holding the driver's side window shut. Just in case you think you saw me. I will definitely NOT be wearing very dark, very large sunglasses and sliding down in the seat just a little bit farther. Nope. Not I.

(And just in case any of you smarty pants out there think it should be "duck tape", go here.)

By the way, I'm on to some of you. I know you (and you KNOW who you are) are just lying in wait to catch me in a grammatical or spelling error. I hope you aren't holding your breath; however, for the record, if and when that happens, I will totally admit that I was wrong. You know there's that little verse about "pride going before destruction" and all.......

11.10.2008

"Not I Monday"


Here we go again! Another "Not I" Monday and another doozy of a week for me. Once again, if you are prone to wet yourself while laughing, consider yourself forewarned. Enjoy!
  • I do not believe that I have set a precedent here and that my faithful readers tune in each Monday (or Tuesday or whatever day I happen to get around to posting!), hoping to read that I have done something completely stupid, klutzy, or idiotic. Nope. Not I.
  • I did not hastily pull a can out from the cabinet and spray my ready-to-go hair with white, fluffy mousse rather than hairspray. Nope. Not I.
  • I did not drive up to the bank teller window today, quickly roll down my window and make a deposit, only to find that the driver's side window had decided that it was tired of going up and down and would like to stay down permanently. Nope. Not I.
  • I did not then pull over in the bank parking lot and, in a most unladylike position, straddle the door of the car in an attempt to push the window button while pulling it up with my hands. Nope. Not I.
  • Having failed at that, I most definitely did NOT drive seven miles home down Rte 140 (a fairly busy four-lane road) with the window all the way down and the heat going full blast. Not I!
  • I most definitely did not call my friend Kari for a recipe WHILE I was driving down Rte. 140, and the story of my dilemma did not force her to hang up because she was laughing so hard that her co-workers were getting suspicious. Nope. Not I.
  • **Edited to add"--I most definitely did NOT reach inside the locked car and hit the unlock button while I was attempting to get the window up at the bank. And I did NOT turn 80 shades of red when the car alarm went off while I was straddling the door, huffing and puffing to pull the window up, and generally mortified.
Can anyone beat that?? Not I!

11.06.2008

Sawyer on Trees

This is a recent writing assignment that Sawyer completed for his Language class. It was too good not to post! He completed this entirely on his own. I have NO idea where he got his information, but I suspect a quick google search provided most of it! I think we may have a budding blogger in the family! Enjoy!

Trees
by Sawyer VeStrand
Trees can be made into wood, which makes pencils. They can make paper too. That's helpful They have all kinds--maple, apple, oak, palm. They can be big or small, fat or skinny. As you know they need water, and they need good, clean, fresh water. There are coniferous and deciduous trees. They can be 300 or 30 feet tall. So trees are super useful. So go out to a field and plant a tree! And don't forget to water it!





11.04.2008

A Little Levity.....

Well, it seems we need a bit of humor around here. So without further ado.....

I really and truly snapped this picture of real product packaging yesterday . This grammar error is quickly making it into my "Top Five Grammar Pet Peeves" of all time. This mistake was printed on millions of packages and sent all over the world. Unbelievable!

The whole sentence reads "We give you three chances to figure out
how not to loose them anymore."


So let's review just one more time, for the record, of course: you LOSE things, you LOSE weight. Your pants are LOOSE. Your lips can be LOOSE. If you "lose" your lips or "loose" weight, you've got bigger problems.

And, finally, your laugh for the day. This one didn't come from one of our cherubs but from a very bright student of Jeff's who desperately did NOT want to win the class spelling bee. Jeff could tell he was trying not to win and when he questioned the poor guy about it, this was his response.

"Mr. VeStrand, I would rather slowly turn to compost while watching Hannah Montana than win the spelling bee. I've been thinking that most of the people who win spelling bees are nerds. And since I'm already halfway to nerdy anyway, I'd rather not win and be all the way there!"

Jeff laughed until he cried. And so did we! Hope it makes you laugh too! (By the way, he came in second and was much relieved!)

Also for the record.....

Since a few of you seem to think you caught my grammar error.....

Is it "speak your piece" or "speak your peace"?

It should be speak (or say) your piece. The other expression is "hold your peace". There's a lot of confusion in usage. Some folks imagine that since these expressions are opposites, the last word in each should be the same; but in fact they are unrelated expressions. "Hold your peace" means to “maintain your silence,” . The other means literally “speak aloud a piece of writing” but is used to express the idea of making a statement.

http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/hold.h...

Just for the record......

I have never moderated my comments nor do I intend to start now. I did however remove the "Anonymous" comments option. You are welcome to disagree with me but the very least you can do is admit who you are and stand up for your view for goodness sake.

I will not, however, tolerate foul and crude language. You can speak your piece without including that. That part of your "lovely" post I did delete.

Comment away.................

11.02.2008

Not I Monday........on Monday this time!!

It's been a doozy of a week, let me tell ya! You might want to sit down, and if you're prone to wet your pants when laughing hard, consider yourself warned.

Alllll-righty then................

This week, I definitely did NOT walk around for two entire days with a kitty stool sample stashed in my purse. That would just be gross!! You see the first sample was too.......ummmmm....old for the lab. So we had to take another sample back the next day. It was lovely.

This week, I definitely did NOT tear up just a bit when I put away Brooke's school picture from this year. I did not suddenly realize that this was her last "school picture." Next year is senior pictures and it's all downhill from there.

I most definitely did NOT get a bit of the warm fuzzies when I stood back and looked at my lovely, organized, clean, and free of junk garage!!

I definitely did NOT count 27--yes 27, EMPTY Rubbermaid containers of all shapes and sizes in my basement. Nope. Not I.

I did NOT wash my hair with Dove Cream Oil Body Wash one sleepy morning last week. I LOVE the stuff for its intended use (on my BODY) but it doesn't work so well on the hair. If you don't believe me, just go ahead and give it a try.

I did NOT schedule my first mammogram today. Nope. Not I. I am NOT. THAT. OLD.

And finally, I absolutely, positively did NOT admire this at the vet's office and I absolutely, positively, for sure did NOT ask the technician if that was really how they checked a dog's eyes? And I did NOT turn 80 shades of red when the technician sheepishly replied "Ma'am, that's just artwork." Nope. Not I.

Any "Not I" moments in your week?

NObama '08

First of all, a few disclaimers:
  1. I know God is not a republican. (I don't think he's a democrat either.)
  2. I know I may lose some readers over this post.
  3. I also know it's my blog and I can post whatever I want.
  4. I know we will ALL answer to God someday for how we vote on Tuesday.
  5. I know John McCain is not the perfect candidate. He's the best of the worst but, at this point, I'll take that.
  6. I know that life begins at conception
  7. I know I don't want to hear any garbage about a woman's right to choose. Aren't you glad YOUR mom chose life? (No I don't believe government needs to legislate this but that's another post.)
With that said, and if you profess to be a believer in Christ, please read this excellent post. (ht: www.whynotobama2008.blogspot.com) Tomorrow, we return to our regularly scheduled programming.

Barack Obama is an impressive speaker who presents himself as a “bridge builder” that will unite Americans of all political persuasions. Obama also speaks openly about his faith and his respect for pro-life and pro-family voters in a way not seen in many recent Democratic candidates for President. Because of these things, many Christians have been considering voting for Obama.

What Christians and other people of faith need to understand is that in spite of Obama’s rhetoric about being a “uniter” who will work for common ground, Obama’s policies could not possibly be more opposed to the views of social conservatives. Indeed, it is not an exaggeration to state that an Obama presidency could undo every single gain that has been made in recent years by pro-life and pro-family Americans. Furthermore, an Obama presidency could usher in a new era of difficulty—or, dare we say, even a persecution—for Christians in the United States the likes of which we have never seen.

All Christian voters need to take their political responsibility seriously and give weighty consideration to these reasons not to vote for Obama. And when you’re done reading, please pass this along to others so that Americans will be informed about the very real potential threats to Christians should Obama become our next President.

1. If Obama becomes President, Roe v. Wade is unlikely to be reversed for years to come
A vote for Obama is not just for Barack Obama himself, but the people whom he would place in positions of authority, most importantly, his appointments to the Supreme Court. At the time of the election five of the Supreme Court justices will be at least 70 years of age, and Justice John Paul Stevens is a ripe old 88! Therefore, it is highly likely that the next President will appoint multiple justices to the Supreme Court.
The Court is currently sharply divided and most believe that Bush’s appointments of Justices Alito and Roberts provide four of the five votes necessary to overturn Roe v. Wade. One or two more conservative justices would certainly result in reversing Roe v. Wade, which for the first time since 1973 would allow states to protect the unborn by law. On the other hand, if Obama is elected then his judicial appointments will likely provide a cushion to the current pro-abortion majority, possibly ensuring that Roe v. Wade remains the law of the land for decades to come.

During this election South Dakotans will vote on a law to restrict abortion except for cases of rape, incest and maternal health. Pro-life leaders believe that this has a strong chance of passing and would be likely to come before the Supreme Court in 2011 or 2012, setting up the next major test case to Roe v. Wade. Thus, the next President is likely to determine whether Roe v. Wade stands or falls. No other issue can compare with the gravity of the nearly 50 million precious unborn lives that have been lost—as well as the countless women and men who have been emotionally scarred—thanks to abortion since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973. Christians have a duty to seize the opportunity before us in 2008 and say no more to legalized abortion and the candidates who support it.

2. Obama’s first act as president would erase every existing common sense restriction on abortion.

Obama openly declared that “the first thing I’d do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.”[1] The pro-abortion rights National Organization for Women claims that this act “would sweep away hundreds of anti-abortion laws, policies" at all levels of government.[2] With one stroke of the pen, Obama and the Democratic Congress would wipe out all of the common sense restrictions that have been placed on abortion over past decades, including the following: [3]


· All 50 states’ requirements for state abortion reporting
· 44 states' laws concerning parental involvement
· 40 states' laws on restricting later-term abortions
· 46 states' conscience protection laws for individual health care providers
· 27 states' conscience protection laws for institutions
· 38 states' bans on partial-birth abortion
· 33 states' laws on requiring counseling before an abortion
· 28 states' laws requiring a waiting period before an abortion, and
· 16 states' laws concerning ultrasounds before an abortion

3. Obama steadfastly opposed a “Born Alive Infants Protection law” in Illinois.

While Obama was a state senator in the Illinois legislature, he defeated a bill nearly identical to the Born Alive Infants Protection Act passed by a vote of 98-0 in the U.S. Senate in 2001. Documents prove that Obama led his fellow Democrats on the legislative committee to kill the bill over concerns it would endanger legal abortion.[4]

These laws were introduced in response to multiple accounts of botched abortions resulting in infants being born alive and left to die. For example, Jill Stanek worked as a nurse at Christ Hospital in Chicago and went public with the hospital’s practice of inducing premature labor for women seeking late-term abortions. Sometimes the babies were born breathing and alive, and were then left on the counter to perish. Stanek testified that one time she held a precious baby for 45 minutes until he died.
It is astonishing that Obama was so committed to protecting abortion that he could vote against this act in the face of evidence that it was going on in his own state. Obama now claims that he would have supported the federal law, but his actual voting record puts him in a more pro-abortion position than Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, or Barbara Boxer—and that’s hard to do!

4. Obama and the Democrats want taxpayers to fund abortions.

The 2008 Democratic Platform states that the party “strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay” (emphasis added). In other words, if a woman can’t afford an abortion, Democrats plan to force taxpayers to pick up the tab. Obama voted against legislation in the Illinois State Senate that prohibited taxpayer dollars from being used to pay for abortion and believes that Medicaid should cover abortions.[5] Obama would also continue giving hundreds of millions of federal funds each year to Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest provider of abortions, as evidenced by his votes against cutting off funding for the agency as a Senator.

5. Obama would reverse the "Mexico City Policy."

This policy, which had been started by Ronald Reagan, discontinued by Bill Clinton, and restored by George W. Bush, prevents international funding from going to organizations that promote or perform abortions. Under the Bush administration the United States government has been a thorn in the side of the powerful pro-abortion forces at the United Nations. If Obama is elected, the U.S. will switch sides and begin throwing its huge influence behind those trying to define legal abortion as an “international human right” and impose it on the rest of the world.

6. Obama wants to begin new federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.

Even though recent scientific advances have rendered this type of research unnecessary, Obama still wants to use taxpayer dollars to do research on stem cells that require the destruction of human embryos. John McCain previously supported federal funding embryonic stem cell research, but his website gives reason to believe that he no longer holds that position.[6] It is also worth recalling that while adult stem cells have resulted in numerous cures, embryonic stem cells have yet to produce a single cure.

7. Obama’s judicial appointees could require same-sex “marriage.”

Decisions by the state Supreme Courts in Massachusetts and California are requiring the states to recognize same-sex “marriages” for both residents and non-residents who come to the state seeking a marriage license. Not only does this give legal blessing to what Christianity has always deemed as disordered and immoral, but it has important ramifications for the rest of society too. Same-sex "marriage" by law affects business laws, threatens the tax-exempt status of churches, and shapes what is taught in schools.[7] For instance, in California, a state “tolerance” initiative now requires schools to promote a positive view of homosexuality, bisexuality, and transsexuality in the classroom.[8] Educational organizations are legally barred from receiving any state funding unless they conform to the state’s policy against the traditional family, and public schools could even be required to allow boys to use girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose. Given Obama’s stated liberal views and radical pro-gay agenda[9], it is entirely reasonable to conclude that Obama will appoint judges on the Supreme Court with similar judicial philosophies to those on the State Supreme Court in California, thus resulting in similar rulings at the federal level for the entire United States.

8. Obama wants to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

“DOMA” was passed by President Clinton and said that states could not be forced to recognize same-sex “marriages” contracted in other states as they ordinarily would be required to do under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution. If this is overturned, then states no longer have the strength of federal law behind them if they choose to maintain the traditional definition of marriage, and could end up being required by courts to accept same-sex “marriages” contracted in other states. Obama’s website states that he “believes we need to fully repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and enact legislation that would ensure that the 1,100+ federal legal rights and benefits currently provided on the basis of marital status are extended to same-sex couples in civil unions and other legally-recognized unions.”[10]

9. Obama’s support for "gay rights" threatens churches and Christian organizations.

The battle over “gay rights” holds numerous threats for Christian churches and organizations. For example, in Massachusetts, the state’s largest provider of adoption services, Catholic Charities, lost its state licensing because it would not provide adoption services to homosexual couples. The same thing also recently happened to Catholic Charities in the United Kingdom. It should be noted that Obama’s website states that his support for same-sex unions specifically mentions giving gay couples "equal legal rights ... including adoption rights.”

In countries like Canada and Sweden, Christian pastors have been taken to court for “hate speech” crimes for preaching from the Scripture about the immorality of homosexual acts. Even in the United States, the Boy Scouts had to go to the Supreme Court to defend their organization’s ability to prevent homosexuals from being troop leaders. The Scouts had lost their case at the state level and only won at Supreme Court by a narrow 5-4 vote. Note that the Court was within a single vote of requiring a private organization to accept leaders whose views were clearly at odds with the organization’s core Christian values. With one or two more liberal justices on the Court, the Boy Scouts and other traditional organizations could find themselves on the losing side of such cases.

10. Obama could force Christian pharmacists out of business.

Obama’s website speaks of ending “insurance discrimination against contraception.”[11] Should Obama get elected, there will be little concern given to Christians who have qualms with contraceptives, the “morning-after pill” (Plan B), and the like. Some states have already passed laws requiring pharmacists to provide so-called “emergency contraception.” In Obama’s native Illinois, the Governor issued an executive order that resulted in Christian pharmacists losing their jobs for declining to dispense the morning-after pill on conscientious grounds. Christians can expect such battles to grow nationally if Obama follows through and signs legislation requiring insurance and pharmaceutical companies to cover and provide drugs that act as abortifacients.

Some might dismiss these ten reasons as “fear-mongering” from the religious right. But should Obama get elected—and especially if he is joined by a Democratic-controlled Congress—these potential impacts are entirely reasonable to predict. In fact, most of them are simply goals that Barack Obama and the Democrats have publicly stated for all to hear. The examples cited above show that these dangers are real and are already taking place in our own country. Christians and others concerned with traditional values need to be made aware of the very real threats to their religious liberties they could face should Obama get elected.

Clearly, John McCain and Sarah Palin are worlds apart from Barack Obama and Joe Biden. McCain chose for his running mate Sarah Palin, who not only speaks about being pro-life, but has lived it out by choosing to give birth to her son with Down’s Syndrome, whom she describes as “perfect.” A McCain-Palin administration would not only be strongly pro-life and pro-family, it would provide a living testimony and constant reminder of the beauty of embracing life.

Consider John McCain’s words below and contrast them with Obama’s positions above, and the choice for people of faith in 2008 is clear:

I will look for accomplished men and women, with a proven record of excellence in the law, and a proven commitment, to strictly interpreting the Constitution of the United States. I will look for people in the cast of John Roberts, Sam Alito, my friend the late William Rehnquist, jurists of the highest caliber who know their own minds, and know the law, and know the difference. I have been pro-life, my entire public career. I am pro-life, because I know what it is like, to live without human rights, where human life is accorded no inherent value. And I know that I have a personal obligation to advocate human rights wherever they are denied, in Bosnia or Burma, in Cuba or the Middle East, and in our own country, when we fail to respect the inherent dignity of all human life, born or unborn. That is a personal testament, which you need not take on faith. You need only to examine my public record, to know that I won't change my position.
- John McCain's Remarks in Speech to National Pro-Life Convention, July 22, 2008.

[1] Obama’s speech to Planned Parenthood can be watched at http://www.imoneinamillion.com/
[2] See http://www.now.org/issues/abortion/070430foca.html
[3] “Focusing On FOCA: 'Freedom Of Choice Act' Would Harm Women And Remove Freedoms” by Tom McClusky. http://www.frc.org/insight/focusing-on-foca-freedom-of-choice-act-would-harm-women-and-remove-protections
[4] “NRL Update: Monday, August 18, 2008 Obama Cover-up on Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Continues to Unravel After Sen. Obama Says NRLC is "Lying" by Douglas Johnson at http://www.nrlc.org/obamaBAIPA/Obamacoveruponbornalive.htm
[5] Obama’s campaign has stated that he does not support the “Hyde Amendment,” which prohibits Medicaid funding from covering abortions.
[6] http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/95b18512-d5b6-456e-90a2-12028d71df58.htm
[7] http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.3374821/k.53FF/The_Threat_to_Marriage.htm
[8] http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58130
[9] See the "LGBT" section of Barack Obama’s website: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/lgbt.pdf
[10] See the "LGBT" section of Barack Obama’s website: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/lgbt.pdf
[11]] http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/womenissues